tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14247942.post4477748398461661355..comments2023-08-10T05:32:21.163-04:00Comments on An Examined Life: A Witty Reading of HistoryVitae Scrutatorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12808120163472036743noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14247942.post-16366949340059731492007-10-26T20:36:00.000-04:002007-10-26T20:36:00.000-04:00Thanks Scott, that is beautiful. Couldn't have sa...Thanks Scott, that is beautiful. Couldn't have said it half so well myself. <BR/>Tony MAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14247942.post-64732153300625448902007-10-23T09:24:00.000-04:002007-10-23T09:24:00.000-04:00Is there a difference-in-kind between the Church w...Is there a difference-in-kind between the Church which lived by the Old Testament and oral witness of the Apostles and the Church which lives by the Old Testament and the New Testament? Is there not in both cases the same submission to the apostolic deposit of faith? What has changed, so it appears to me, is not the Church and the way she lives from the revelation of Christ but simply the mode of the apostolic witness (from oral tradition to written tradition). No doubt the move from oral tradition to written tradition poses its own challenges, but I do not see a decisive change in the way the Church lives as Church. <BR/><BR/>What am I missing?Striderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07859685939890312325noreply@blogger.com